Philosophy Reborn: Part of a Bigger Vision
Philosophy Reborn is one of the three initiatives announced in The Calling. Despite the initiatives being able to stand on their own, each relates and reinforces one another to create a bigger vision. To highlight that relation I decided to preface each initiative’s overview with a passage from The Calling that makes that clear:
1. To achieve any human goal, you need to have a measure of freedom from necessity. By necessity I mean the basic needs. Without those needs satisfied, any human endeavor becomes practically impossible to achieve.
2. If you find a way to satisfy the basic needs, a question naturally occurs. Now that are you free from necessity, what will you use your freedom for?
3. If you decide upon a certain use for your freedom, given humans tend to live together in groups and/or countries, it’s important to live under socio-political conditions that allow you to exercise your choices.
Regenerating Freedom deals with the first issue. Achieving freedom from necessity in a way that doesn’t harm the environment, depend on the government, or require the servitude of others. Its goal is to use modern technology to achieve that with the minimum amount of labor.
Philosophy Reborn deals with the second issue. By reviving the original meaning of philosophy, it aims to facilitate our quest in understanding our world and what we should do in it.
Filiki Eteria deals with the third issue. For once we do come to some conclusions as to what we should do and why, we want to proceed into building a life that enables us to do that. To have that liberty, presupposes a socio-political framework that allows for that possibility. Filiki Eteria deals with creating such frameworks, finding ways to overcome the theoretical and practical challenges inherent in such initiatives.
These initiatives constitute the vision of Idealism in Practice.
Introduction: Why philosophy cannot die while we’re living
Everyone lives by a philosophy. By a philosophy I mean the collection of fundamental beliefs, goals, methods, practices, principles and values that make up our worldview and determine our behavior, actions, decisions and our attempts to understand, explain and master the world we live in, at any given point in time. Whether we are conscious of it or not, our philosophy affects what we do in life, why we do it and how we go about doing it. It affects the quality of life and its purpose. In short, irrespective of what philosophy we have, it is of singular importance to our lives whether we acknowledge it or not.
The activity of philosophy can be described as the willful process of becoming aware of that collection, submitting it to critical examination and experiment, and changing our lives through the insights and results generated by that activity. In short, it is the art of living — its artists, the philosophers — its purpose, the good life.
The conception of philosophy referred to above cuts through many different disciplines and practices and utilizes learning from all in the service of the art of living. This conception of philosophy, explained and explored in more detail in these posts, is hardly idiosyncratic but consistent with the original historic definition and practice of philosophy as found in its place of origin, ancient Greece. Philosophy literally means the love of wisdom; an endless quest for mastery in the art of living.
It should therefore come as no surprise that what we now call science, including a number of the particular sciences themselves, were the result of philosophical activity. The beginning of science in the Western world tends to be attributed to Pre-Socratic philosophers, like Thales and Democritus, while later philosophers, like Plato and Aristotle, are generally regarded as either having fathered or made major contributions to several branches of knowledge1. Isaac Newton did not call himself a scientist but a natural philosopher2, whereas the most influential publication of the 18th century Enlightenment3, the Encyclopédie, placed most of the sciences under philosophy4. In fact, up until the 19th century what we now call the natural sciences were then the province of natural philosophy5.
Though we can go through life without ever painting, playing music or writing verse, it is impossible to go through life without making any judgments about the nature of the world and what we ought to do in it.
That is why, as long as we live, there will always be a measure of philosophizing6, and philosophy will die only when consciousness and reason are extinguished from the universe.
The right question, therefore, is not whether philosophy is dead or not, for anyone questioning existence is already engaged in some form of it, but whether we want to remain beginners in the art of enquiry and living7 or become its masters.
Philosophy Now and Then
After I finished a Bachelor’s and a Master’s degree in philosophy, at the beginning of the 21st century, I was hit by two realizations. The first was that philosophy as originally conceived is of fundamental importance to everyone no matter what life they choose to live. The second was that it was not being taught or practiced that way anymore in contemporary universities.
Most contemporary professors of philosophy teach you how to analyze the good life rather than live it. But mistaking conceptual dissection for philosophy requires you to kill her in the process. That is what most professors have been doing the past century: Killing philosophy and making a living being the anatomists of thought. No wonder people lost interest in philosophy, since hardly anyone wants to solely be an anatomist of thought – yet everyone wants to live a good life.
The original conception of philosophy grows directly out of our recurring need to ask fundamental questions about life and the universe, discover the best methods to answer them and find ways to apply those answers. It recognizes no departmental borders to its activity but explores all fields helpful to its quest. It starts with wonder and is motivated by love.
That is why in antiquity, the commercialization of philosophical activity perpetrated by the sophists who clearly exhibited motives other than love, was heavily criticised by the philosophers of the day on moral grounds, describing it as prostitution of the soul8. In fact, the great schools of antiquity, like the Academy of Plato and the Lyceum of Aristotle, famously did not charge any tuition fees9.
Philosophy was not done for profit, or to serve any particular doctrine, but to discover common truths. Philosophers holding different views debated one another, in the spirit of friendship and parrhesia10, without being forced to reach similar conclusions11.
Philosophy was predominantly done in public spaces, like gymnasiums or stoae, while philosophers lived communally near those spaces12. They used donations and their own wealth to set up the equivalent of modern foundations in ancient times so that philosophical activity remained free, the philosophers free from the need to labor, and the grounds related to each school passed on to posterity for that use alone13.
Though philosophers at times dealt with topics considered esoteric to the general public, they also actively participated in public affairs, Socrates famously engaging anyone willing, regardless of their station in life, to philosophically examine topics both personal and public14.
Unfortunately, the original conception of philosophy is dead in contemporary academic institutions and dismembered both in and outside the academy15. Some parts are still done in isolation at philosophy departments, others have migrated to the humanities and sciences. Some have been taken up by activists, intentional communities and think tanks, others are hijacked by modern sophists like life coaches, “philosophical counselors”, motivational speakers, management consultants, or the modern medley of religion, spirituality, therapy, yoga, meditation and self-help.
The original conception of philosophy may be dead in the institutions that ironically get their name, “academic”, from an ancient philosophical school that fully embodied it, namely Plato’s Academy, but the yearning for wisdom has never died in the hearts of men. If philosophy is to be reborn, both in and out of the academy, it needs to meet that yearning with a conception — and motives — worthy of it. That conception exists but it has been forgotten.
As mentioned before, the Greek word for truth, aletheia, etymologically means “not-to-forget”. When we forget what things mean, we can’t tell the counterfeits. What goes by the name of philosophy nowadays, in and out of the academy, cannot fulfill the yearning of the heart for wisdom, just like fake food cannot nourish the hungry.
It is only by remembering the original meaning of philosophy that it can be reborn. As long as it stays forgotten, we’ll be giving birth to stillborns. A tragic irony given the archetypical philosopher, Socrates, described the role of the philosopher as that of a midwife16, helping others give birth to their ideas.
The Philosophy Reborn Initiative
The Philosophy Reborn initiative is about remembering the original meaning of philosophy in theory and practice.
It’s about ending the dismemberment of philosophy, recognizing no departmental borders to its activity and reclaiming domains currently hijacked by charlatans and modern sophists while offering something better — for free — just like Socrates, Plato and Aristotle.
In order for philosophers to be able to offer philosophy for free, they need to be free themselves, which is one of the reasons I launched the Regenerating Freedom initiative, which aims to help any group of people achieve freedom from necessity in a way that doesn’t harm the environment, depend on the government, or require the servitude of others. Its goal is to use modern technology to achieve that with the minimum amount of labor. Using that initiative would allow philosophers to re-create the preconditions for pure philosophical activity in the form of self-sufficient philosophical communities — Academies Reborn — which can afford to avoid market pressures and the ceaseless search for grant money. In such a setup philosophers can virtually eliminate administration work, make teaching voluntary, grading optional or unnecessary, and abolish the publish-or-perish mentality and anything unrelated to the activity itself or the wishes of those engaged in it — perhaps even one day create their own Callipolis17 through the Filiki Eteria initiative.
The Philosophy Reborn initiative is about ending philosophy’s self-imposed exile from the public sphere, utilizing or creating technologies, like Autodialectics, to universally augment philosophical activity and progress.
Sign up here.
- See the Wikipedia Entry for the History of Science
- See Wikipedia entry for Isaac Newton
- According to the Wikipedia entry on the Enlightenment
- See the Wikipedia article on Figurative system of human knowledge
- From Wikipedia entry on Natural Philosophy
- On that point see the quote by Jaspers in Wisdom is more important than Knowledge
- The two, inquiry and living, famously featured in the Socratic dictum that “the unexamined life is not worth living”
- See Philosophy, Note #3
- See Wikipedia’s articles on Plato’s Academy while for whether Aristotle accepted payment see pages p.65-67 from Aristotle: His Life and School by C. Natali, Princeton University Press, 2013
- See Parrhesia in Wikipedia
- As a result, the successors of Plato and Aristotle in their respective schools many times had philosophical opinions at odds with those of Plato and Aristotle, see Hadot’s What is Ancient Philosophy?
- See Hadot’s What is Ancient Philosophy?, Part 2.
- See Aristotle: His Life and School by C. Natali, p.83-89, Princeton University Press, 2013
- See Doing Philosophy
- It’s worth noting that there have been academics, Nicholas Maxwell and his “From Knowledge to Wisdom” project being a characteristic example, who have spent their entire lives admirably trying to put wisdom, and thus philosophy as originally conceived, right back at the center stage of academic inquiry. But their message seems to have fallen on deaf ears
- See Plato’s Theataetus
- Callipolis is the name Socrates uses for his utopia in Plato’s Republic. Here I am not exhorting philosophers build Plato’s ideal city—anyone reading Popper’s The Open Society and Its Enemies should have very serious reservations to do so—but to envision and attempt to build their own.
- A number of key ideas from Kant’s essay An answer to the question: “What is Enlightenment?” supplemented by Foucault’s considerations can serve as a starting point.
- This would involve constructively revising it in light of the criticisms of the Counter-Enlightenment and other ones, like the one by Nicholas Maxwell here.